Beam vs FlinkEvergreen Article

Choosing the Right Runner: Flink vs. Spark vs. Dataflow

Published: July 02, 20268 min read

One of the core promises of Apache Beam is portability: the ability to write a pipeline once in Java, Python, or Go, and run it on different backend engines without modifying the code.

However, choosing the right execution Runner is critical for production success. The three most popular runners are Google Cloud Dataflow, Apache Flink, and Apache Spark.


1. Google Cloud Dataflow

Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully managed, serverless runner. It is the native home of the Apache Beam programming model.

  • Best For: GCP-native architectures, serverless requirements, and complex streaming pipelines.
  • Aesthetic/Ops: Zero infrastructure management. Worker provisioning, scaling, state management, and updates are fully automated by Google.
  • Key Advantage: The Streaming Engine separates state storage from computing VMs, enabling rapid autoscale updates.
  • Drawbacks: Vendor lock-in to Google Cloud Platform. High serverless cost premiums under steady, predictable workloads.

2. Apache Flink

Apache Flink is a low-latency, stateful streaming engine designed for high-performance continuous processing.

  • Best For: On-premise deployments, multi-cloud setups, and ultra-low latency requirements (< 100ms).
  • Aesthetic/Ops: Flink executes streams as continuous, event-driven pipelines (not micro-batches), providing true real-time processing.
  • Key Advantage: Highly customizable state backends (like RocksDB) that can support massive states with minimal overhead.
  • Drawbacks: Significant operational complexity. You must configure and manage your own Flink cluster, checkpoints, and task managers.

3. Apache Spark

Apache Spark is the industry standard for large-scale distributed batch processing.

  • Best For: Heavy batch ETL workloads, machine learning integration, and existing Hadoop/Databricks environments.
  • Aesthetic/Ops: Spark uses a micro-batching model (even for Structured Streaming), which introduces slight latency compared to Flink.
  • Key Advantage: Vast ecosystem. If your organization already runs Databricks or Amazon EMR, executing Beam on Spark requires no new infrastructure.
  • Drawbacks: Not as feature-rich for advanced event-time windowing or late data handling compared to Flink or Dataflow.

4. Runner Feature Comparison Matrix

| Capability | Cloud Dataflow | Apache Flink | Apache Spark | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Execution Model | Serverless Batch/Stream | Continuous Streaming | Micro-batch / Batch | | State Storage | Managed Cloud State | RocksDB / Memory | Heap Memory / Disk | | Autoscaling | Fully Automated | Manual / Reactive | Workload-based | | Deployment Home | Google Cloud Only | On-Premise / Any Cloud | On-Premise / Any Cloud | | Best Workload | Streaming & Batch | Real-time Streams | Batch & Analytics |